Skripsi
EFEKTIVITAS GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE OLEH ALIANSI HUMANITER INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP PELANGGARAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA DI NAURU DAN PAPUA NUGINI
Since the ratification of the 1951 Geneva Convention on the status of refugees, state parties have been obligated to uphold the human rights of refugees, including asylum seekers. However, in practice, human rights violations against asylum seekers frequently occur. Such violations have become one of the most prominent issues in the discourse surrounding Australia's offshore processing policy. Originating from the 2001 Tampa Affair, this issue has increasingly gained attention from non-state actors, particularly international humanitarian organizations. This study examines the effectiveness of the global humanitarian response carried out by international humanitarian alliances UNHCR, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch in addressing human rights violations against asylum seekers resulting from offshore processing policies in Nauru and Papua New Guinea. This research employs a qualitative approach and adopts M. Zeeshan Naseer's concept of global humanitarian response, which comprises four main indicators: a rights-based approach, strengthening international cooperation, fostering inclusive policies, and enhancing support for local communities. The findings indicate that the global humanitarian response by UNHCR, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch demonstrates strong commitment to addressing human rights violations against asylum seekers in Nauru and Papua New Guinea. However, the effectiveness of these efforts remains limited and does not fully meet all indicators, resulting in the absence of a sustainable protection system for asylum seekers and local communities. Therefore, the effectiveness of the global humanitarian response can be categorized as partial, with significant achievements in advocacy yet still requiring improved, concrete, and long-term implementation of human rights protections.
No other version available