Skripsi
KOMPARASI KINERJA MODEL NAIVE BAYES, SVM, DAN RANDOM FOREST DALAM KLASIFIKASI SENTIMEN ULASAN PADA APLIKASI GOOGLE GEMINI
The increasing number of reviews for the Google Gemini app on Google Play Store reflects a variety of user opinions regarding the performance of this AI-based application. To identify sentiment patterns, this study conducted a comparative study of three classification algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes, and Random Forest, using 14,479 raw reviews collected through scraping. These reviews then underwent several pre-processing steps, including case folding, text cleaning, tokenization, normalization, stopword removal, and stemming. After being labeled based on ratings, the dataset formed a highly imbalanced class distribution, consisting of 11,252 positive reviews and 1,571 negative reviews, and was then divided using the Hold-Out method with a training ratio of 80% and a testing ratio of 20%. The evaluation showed that SVM achieved the best performance, yielding an accuracy of 91%, precision of 93%, recall of 97%, and an F1-score of 95%, outperforming Random Forest and Naïve Bayes, which achieved an accuracy of 90% each. Overall, these results highlight SVM as the most effective algorithm for classifying sentiment in Google Gemini reviews, while the dominance of positive feedback indicates a relatively high level of user satisfaction, although model performance on the minority (negative) class remains a challenge due to data imbalance.
No other version available